The ongoing cognitive revolution driven by AI technologies will not leave the labor market in information security untouched. This article examines the tectonic shift underway: how autonomous agents are displacing linear routine work, which specializations are becoming scarce, how the architecture of cyber defense will change by 2030, and what engineers should learn today.
Artificial intelligence does not cancel information security; on the contrary, by expanding the attack surface it makes the InfoSec market larger. The key question is what role remains for humans. For a long time, a specialist’s value was measured by the volume of mechanical work: the number of alerts dissected, log lines reviewed, reports sent, or checklist settings verified. Today these streaming operations are being taken over by language models and autonomous agents. Humans are moving to the level of setting frameworks, verifying hypotheses, and being the sole subject bearing legal and financial responsibility for decisions made.
The main automation risk arises not for the “security professional” profession as a whole, but for positions consisting entirely of repeatable deterministic actions. At the same time, the shortage of system architects, AppSec and DevSecOps engineers, specialists protecting AI circuits themselves, and experts who can link raw network anomalies to business risk is sharpening.
Automation of Actions Instead of Automation of Responsibility
In May 2026 the international association ISC2 surveyed 856 cybersecurity specialists who regularly use AI in operational processes. Over one year, 65% of respondents began spending substantially more time deciding whether model outputs can be trusted, and 63% spent more time directly verifying results. At the same time, exactly 50% emphasized that in case of an erroneous decision, full responsibility in their company rests solely with the human.
Models handle primary event triage, alert deduplication, log normalization, rough vulnerability prioritization, and basic threat hunting. However, saved hours are redirected to validation, resolution of edge cases, and auditing agent reasoning chains. Trust in generative system outputs remains critically fragile: 89% of practicing security professionals have already encountered gross errors and hallucinations from AI-based tools.
Futuristic Outlook: Machine vs Machine Through 2027–2030
Transformation is occurring against the backdrop of a shift from static protection to confrontation between autonomous systems. DARPA’s AIxCC competition showed autonomous cyber defense systems capable of finding defects and generating patches without operator involvement, yet academic audits revealed that 37.7–45.6% of generated fixes contained hidden semantic errors.
Gartner forecasts more than 10 billion autonomous software agents by 2030 and warns of “Cost Exhaustion Attacks” that could drain operational budgets of organizations running public AI services. By 2027, attacks on AI systems are projected to exceed $4.78 billion globally.
Market Polarization and Russian Specifics
Global demand for cybersecurity specialists grew 9.5% year-over-year, with senior positions surging 65% while junior roles grew only 5.9%, according to the AI Workforce Consortium led by Cisco. In Russia, vacancies in information security rose 24–26% in 2025–2026 per Positive Technologies and SuperJob data, yet 46% of companies do not open junior positions because they are unwilling to invest in on-the-job training.
The following table summarizes how 13 specializations are evolving under AI automation, showing what routine tasks are being removed and what complex human responsibilities remain.
