Designing and Implementing Private Cloud Security Across Geographically Distributed Data Centers

The article shares practical experience in designing and deploying protection for a private cloud hosted across two geographically separated data center sites. The project aimed to achieve service resilience, meet information security requirements, and maintain manageable infrastructure. While theoretical designs often combine standard best practices such as high availability, network segmentation, next-generation firewalls, and dynamic routing, real-world implementation revealed significant conflicts between architectural components. Multiple contractor teams participated, each bringing different visions for network architecture and security controls, leading to complex negotiations and compromises. The process evolved into an engineering puzzle where proposed solutions had to be integrated into a functional, scalable system despite technical limitations and differing priorities. The full piece focuses on the journey from an idealized design to practical deployment through iterative problem-solving rather than deep technical dives.

HabrTranslated from Russian

Read at source

In this article the author shares practical experience in designing and implementing protection for a private cloud hosted across two geographically separated sites of a data center (ЦОД).

The material does not contain deep technical details but instead describes the path from an assumed ideal solution to real-world implementation through research, errors, technical constraints, and necessary compromises.

Background and Objectives

The task appeared fairly standard: ensure service resilience, achieve compliance with information security requirements, and preserve normal manageability of the infrastructure.

On paper such projects usually look like combinations of best practices: high availability, segmentation, NGFW, some dynamic routing, and it seems that this should be sufficient.

In practice everything proved more complicated when each element of the architecture began to conflict with the others, especially when several contractor teams participated and each team held its own vision of how the network and security architecture should look.

At one point the discussions started to resemble an engineering construction set: every party offered its own solution, and the task was to assemble from these proposals a working and scalable system.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Other

Mail.ru Reduces Lifetime 1TB Cloud Storage Promo to Standard 8GB Quota for Select Users
Kimi K3 Open Model Surpasses Closed AI Leaders with Million-Token Context and 896 Experts
Innostage Completes Functional Testing of PT NGFW 1.10.3 Across 156 Criteria