NetEase Zhiyi Unveils Agent Guard and External Security Control Plane for Enterprise AI Agents at WAIC 2026

At WAIC 2026 in Shanghai, NetEase Zhiyi presented its upgraded enterprise AI application services focused on security governance. The company introduced the concept of an independent external security control plane that acts like a brainstem for large models, handling rapid risk responses separate from the model's core reasoning. Key products include the Emperor Crab enterprise AI Agent platform and Agent Guard, which applies a four-step process of mapping, controlling, isolating, and terminating risky Agent behaviors. NetEase emphasizes that AI safety must shift from content compliance to behavioral control as Agents gain tool-calling and autonomous execution capabilities. The approach combines internal safety measures during model training with real-time perimeter protection at input, output, and execution layers. Market data from IDC projects the Chinese AI security market will grow from 44.1 billion RMB in 2025 to 340.3 billion RMB by 2030 at a 50.5% CAGR.

安全客July 30, 2026Translated from Chinese

Read at source

NetEase Zhiyi showcased its latest enterprise AI security offerings at WAIC 2026 in Shanghai, highlighting the need for both internal model safeguards and an independent external security layer as AI Agents become more autonomous.

The event underscored growing concerns that rapid AI advancement and widespread Agent adoption introduce risks far beyond content generation, extending to autonomous planning, decision-making, and task execution that could impact critical infrastructure in finance, energy, communications, and transportation.

NetEase Zhiyi, a one-stop enterprise AI service provider under NetEase, serves millions of companies across entertainment, social, gaming, retail, manufacturing, and finance sectors. At the conference it presented the Emperor Crab enterprise AI Agent platform alongside the Agent Guard security product, along with private-domain assistants and AI customer-service tools.

According to Zhu Haoqi, vice general manager of NetEase Zhiyi, stronger intelligence requires security constraints independent of the model itself. The company advocates building an auditable, updatable external “security control plane” that monitors input, output, tool calls, and permission execution.

This external layer functions similarly to the brainstem, enabling instinctive risk avoidance without involving the model’s higher reasoning processes. It detects prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, and malicious requests at the input stage, performs real-time auditing and hallucination detection at the output stage, and continuously monitors Agent tool invocations and execution results.

Agent Guard implements a “map, control, isolate, terminate” framework: first discovering all Agents and their connected tools, then analyzing intent and sensitive data flows, followed by whitelisting and sandbox isolation, and finally blocking anomalous behavior when necessary.

NetEase Zhiyi also described internal safety capabilities that clean multimodal training data, label safety datasets, and evaluate models before deployment, reducing inherited risks from unfiltered corpora.

Market research firm IDC forecasts the Chinese AI security market will expand from 44.1 billion RMB in 2025 to 340.3 billion RMB by 2030, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 50.5 percent.

WAIC 2026 NetEase Zhiyi Agent Guard Zhu Haoqi Emperor Crab IDC

ShareX Facebook LinkedIn Reddit

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in AI Security

AI Security

Logical Argument Claims Full Alignment of Superintelligent AGI Is Fundamentally Impossible

A detailed analysis argues that the AI alignment problem cannot be solved for systems exceeding human cognitive capabilities. The paper presents a formal proof showing that any control mechanism created by humans will inevitably be circumvented by a more intelligent agent. It draws on foundational theorems from logic and cybernetics to support the conclusion that alignment is not an engineering challenge but a logical impossibility. Recent 2025-2026 research papers reach similar conclusions using computability theory and diagonal arguments. The work concludes that the only way to guarantee alignment is to avoid creating superintelligence altogether. All proposed restrictions are described as temporary delays rather than permanent solutions.

HabrOct 29, 2026Translated from Russian

AI Security

Claude Account Bans Linked to IP Reputation, Device Environment and Payment Channels, But No Confirmed Formula

Discussions on the Chinese forum NodeSeek have highlighted observations from a user who reported bans on more than twenty paid Claude accounts. The user identified IP address reputation, device environment traces, and payment processor history as the main factors potentially triggering blocks by Anthropic. However, the original post does not present a unified scoring system or prove specific penalties for using Linux, browser-only access, or the Fable model. High query volume is described mainly as a rate-limit issue rather than an automatic account ban trigger. Community members remain divided, with some confirming isolated observations while others label the conclusions speculative and share contradictory experiences. No universal method to avoid blocks has emerged from the discussion.

AntiMalwareOct 29, 2026Translated from Russian

AI Security

Local LLMs in AppSec: What Open Tools and Models Can Handle in Application Security

The article examines how local large language models can be integrated into application security workflows without relying on cloud subscriptions. It traces the evolution from llama.cpp in 2023 through agentic frameworks like PentAGI and Strix in 2025-2026. Teams can now run models on local hardware, connect them to code analyzers such as Semgrep, and delegate specific tasks like vulnerability path reconstruction or multi-step application testing. The piece highlights practical scenarios including static code review, dynamic testing with browser and terminal agents, and security evaluation of embedded AI assistants using tools like Garak and PyRIT. It stresses the importance of task decomposition, context management, and verification of model outputs to avoid misleading results. Hardware performance, model selection, and custom agent configurations are presented as key factors for successful adoption.

HabrOct 29, 2026Translated from Russian