Russian Neighbors Fined Over 200,000 Rubles for Defamatory Remarks in Apartment Building Chat as Supreme Court Upholds Ruling

Two women who participated in a shared apartment building chat have been ordered to pay more than 200,000 rubles in total after a court found their messages about a neighbor to be defamatory. The case began when residents complained about noisy tenants and escalated into mutual insults exchanged in the group chat, via SMS, and during phone calls. The apartment owner filed a lawsuit for protection of honor and dignity after police found no administrative violation in his actions as landlord. A linguistic expert determined that several public messages, while free of direct profanity, contained derogatory characterizations and implications of mental illness that could not be considered acceptable value judgments. The court awarded more than 100,000 rubles against one defendant and a slightly smaller sum against the second, taking into account the plaintiff's own conduct during the conflict. All appeals were rejected, including by the Supreme Court, establishing that even indirect humiliating statements about an identifiable person in a building chat can result in substantial financial liability.

AntiMalwareTranslated from Russian

Read at source

Two participants in a shared apartment building chat have been ordered to pay more than 200,000 rubles in compensation after Russian courts, including the Supreme Court, upheld a ruling that their messages about a neighbor were defamatory.

The dispute originated from complaints about noisy tenants in one apartment. Residents raised the issue with the property owner in the building chat, after which the conversation descended into personal attacks. The residents also contacted police, but officers found no grounds for administrative action against the owner. The owner then filed a civil claim for protection of honor and dignity, submitting the chat logs, SMS messages, and recordings of telephone conversations as evidence.

A court-appointed linguistic expert concluded that some of the public statements did not contain swear words or formal insults yet included derogatory descriptions and suggestions of mental health issues. The court ruled that these remarks could not be treated as permissible evaluative opinions. Obscene language was identified in private conversations. Complaints to the police were not considered abusive, as the court found no evidence that the residents had misused their right to contact state authorities.

One defendant was ordered to pay more than 100,000 rubles and the second a slightly lower amount. When calculating the compensation, the court noted that the plaintiff had also behaved inappropriately during the conflict, but this did not exempt the defendants from liability. The decision survived review at every higher instance, including the Supreme Court.

The ruling signals that messages posted in a building chat are treated as public statements capable of damaging an identifiable person's reputation, even without explicit profanity.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Other

Mail.ru Reduces Lifetime 1TB Cloud Storage Promo to Standard 8GB Quota for Select Users
Kimi K3 Open Model Surpasses Closed AI Leaders with Million-Token Context and 896 Experts
Innostage Completes Functional Testing of PT NGFW 1.10.3 Across 156 Criteria