VC.ru Blocks Lawyer's Account After Article Exposing In-Platform Phishing Scheme

A Russian lawyer specializing in IT law and cryptocurrency regulation published an article on VC.ru detailing a phishing operation that abused the platform's own articles. The scheme involved posting seemingly legitimate content that later had links altered to redirect users to fake services stealing crypto assets. Within an hour of publication, the author's four-year-old account was automatically blocked under rules prohibiting multiple accounts to evade bans, despite the author having no prior restrictions or secondary accounts. After formal complaints citing Russian data protection law 152-FZ and consumer protection statutes, the platform reversed the ban but initially reclassified the account as commercial, demanding a monthly fee of 56,000 rubles for indexing. The account status was later restored following further legal correspondence. The incident highlights platform moderation challenges when reporting security threats involving paid accounts on the same site.

HabrTranslated from Russian

Read at source

A lawyer writing under the name David Zamirovich on VC.ru since 2022 had his account blocked shortly after publishing material about a phishing campaign operating through articles on the platform itself.

The original trigger was a report on Habr describing how a victim lost 10k USDT after interacting with malicious links. Zamirovich summarized the attack pattern without naming individuals or posting unredacted screenshots.

The phishing mechanism relied on publishing normal-looking articles that passed moderation and gained search visibility. Attackers later replaced internal links with redirects through intermediaries that led to cloned services. Users connecting wallets and signing verification transactions lost funds.

Zamirovich's article focused on defensive advice and referenced the existing Habr analysis. One hour after publication the account received an automated notice citing violation of rule 5 concerning creation of additional accounts to bypass restrictions.

The author had never operated secondary accounts. He sent formal requests under Article 14 of 152-FZ for disclosure of personal data processing and a consumer-protection claim demanding account restoration and precise reasons for the block.

Support initially claimed an automated system had detected IP overlap with previously banned accounts. The account was restored the same day. Shortly afterward the platform changed the account type to commercial, requiring a monthly payment of 56,000 rubles for search indexing.

After additional legal correspondence the platform reversed the commercial classification on 26 August and restored normal user status. Zamirovich continues to document the case on his Telegram channel Lawyer without bugs.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Fraud & Social Engineering

Scammers Use *#62# USSD Command to Fabricate Surveillance Claims and Steal Victims' Funds
Aroshka Cloud Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged False Claims of SOC 24/7 Operations and High-End Infrastructure
Reports Surface on Alleged De-Anonymization of Admins Running Major Russian Hacker Forums