Swordfish Security

Swordfish Security Raises Investment from VIM Investments to Advance AI Protection and Secure Development Tools

VIM Investments' Pre-IPO 2 fund has acquired a 42.152% minority stake in Swordfish Security, a group combining cybersecurity consulting with tool development. The capital will support expansion of products focused on AI system protection and secure software development practices. Swordfish Security operates through AppSec Solutions, which builds DevSecOps and AI Security offerings, and maintains the Swordfish SAIMM framework for assessing AI protection maturity. Company representatives confirmed the deal but did not disclose the transaction value. The investment aims to shorten development cycles from customer requests to product releases while introducing new AI defense scenarios. Swordfish Security reported 52% revenue growth to 2.1 billion rubles in 2025, partly attributed to rising customer demand for AI security measures.

Bank of Russia Publishes Methodological Recommendations No. 3-MR on AI Security for Financial Market Participants

The Bank of Russia has released methodological recommendations No. 3-MR dated 16 June 2026, providing detailed guidance on ensuring information security during the development and use of artificial intelligence systems in the financial sector. The document builds on the earlier Code of Ethics for AI in finance and integrates with existing risk management, operational resilience, and data protection frameworks already familiar to credit institutions and other market participants. It introduces standardized terminology for AI-specific threats such as hallucinations, data drift, and poisoned datasets while outlining six risk categories and a four-stage AI system lifecycle model. Organizations are advised to apply threat modeling based on FSTEC methodology, implement proportional controls across data preparation, development, training, and operation phases, and maintain human oversight for high-risk automated processes. Special attention is given to supply chain risks involving third-party vendors and open-source components, requiring due diligence, provenance tracking, and contractual safeguards aligned with existing outsourcing standards. The recommendations remain non-binding yet signal clear regulatory expectations that are likely to influence future compliance checks and audits.