Kifid Sets New Standard for Gross Negligence in Unauthorized Bank Payments

The Dutch financial complaints institute Kifid has introduced a clearer benchmark for determining gross negligence by bank customers in cases of unauthorized payments. The ruling stems from a dispute involving a Rabobank customer whose phone was stolen during a holiday in Ibiza, leading to 3,500 euros in unauthorized transactions via Apple Pay. Although Kifid confirmed the payments were unauthorized and the customer had filed a police report, it rejected the claim for reimbursement. The institute found the customer grossly negligent for failing to explain how the phone's Face ID and passcode protections were bypassed. Kifid defined gross negligence as acting or omitting to act in an unusually high degree that a normal, reasonable, and careful payer would never do. The decision references an earlier Commission of Appeal ruling that had created inconsistent interpretations of the term. Rabobank is not required to compensate the customer, though an appeal remains possible.

Security.NLTranslated from NL

Read at source

The Dutch financial complaints institute Kifid has introduced a new benchmark to determine when bank customers act with gross negligence in cases of unauthorized payments.

The ruling follows a complaint from a Rabobank customer whose phone was stolen during a holiday in Ibiza. The theft resulted in 3,500 euros worth of unauthorized payments executed through the device. The customer reported the incident to police and asked the bank to reimburse the losses, but Rabobank refused, stating that the customer had failed to meet security obligations and had acted with gross negligence.

Kifid confirmed that the payments were indeed unauthorized. The customer demonstrated that the transactions occurred after the phone was taken from her handbag, and the bank could not prove she had consented to the payments. According to Kifid, authentication records alone do not constitute proof of customer consent when technical factors or theft are involved.

Under Dutch law, banks must refund unauthorized payments unless the customer committed fraud or intentionally or with gross negligence violated the bank's security rules. Kifid noted that an earlier decision by its Commission of Appeal had created uncertainty by linking gross negligence to situations where a customer knowingly participated in fraud. The Geschillencommissie therefore formulated a clearer standard: a customer is grossly negligent if they do or omit something in an unusually high degree that a normal, reasonable, and careful payer would never do or omit.

In this case, the payments were made via Apple Pay, which requires Face ID, Touch ID, or a passcode. The customer stated her phone was protected by both Face ID and a passcode, yet could not explain how the code reached the thieves. Kifid concluded that the customer had failed to comply with security rules for Apple Pay payments in an exceptionally serious manner and therefore acted with gross negligence. The claim was rejected, and Rabobank is not obliged to compensate the losses. The customer may still appeal the decision.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Policy & Regulation

Belgian Government Urges Citizens to Secure Internet-Connected Private Refrigerators
FBI and Partner Agencies Urge Supermarkets to Disconnect Refrigeration Systems from the Internet
Secunet Expands Sovereign Cloud Portfolio with Fides Governance and ServiceNow AI Workflows