Justice and Security Minister Van Weel has stated that drones used by the Amsterdam police for traffic enforcement do not possess AI image recognition capabilities. The technology is also not applied to any captured footage after the fact.
In September the Amsterdam police announced via Instagram that drones would monitor specific serious traffic violations, including driving under a red cross, reversing on a motorway, and crossing a gore point or hatched area. The announcement prompted parliamentary questions from FVD MP Van Duyvenvoorde, who inquired about the technical specifications of the drones and cameras.
Minister Van Weel explained that the cameras contain multiple lenses and sensors, allowing officers to switch between wide overview, extreme zoom, and thermal imaging. Images are recorded at a resolution of 48 megapixels, and the drone is equipped with a laser rangefinder. However, the camera systems contain no AI image recognition, and this technology is not used in post-processing. Identification of violations depends exclusively on the observation of a police officer.
The minister further noted that footage is not recorded continuously. Only a single photograph is taken when an offence is observed. Operations are initiated solely on the basis of reports concerning dangerous driving at a particular location, ensuring the activity remains incidental and geographically limited.
Van Weel confirmed that no formal legal assessment of potential fundamental rights infringements was conducted, as the limited scope of the operations does not create a comprehensive picture of an individual’s personal life. The drones are technically capable of identifying persons at long range, yet the working method is restricted to photographing the rear of vehicles so that drivers and passengers remain unrecognisable.

