MeridianMeridian

EFF Criticizes Google for Pushing AI Tools on Schools

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has sharply criticized Google for attempting to force AI tools on U.S. schools by linking access to Google Search with acceptance of its Gemini AI. After public backlash, Google reversed the requirement, allowing schools to continue using Search without mandatory Gemini integration. However, the EFF argues that the broader strategy of embedding AI into core services still pressures educational institutions into adopting generative AI. The organization calls for an easy way to disable AI-generated answers in Search without requiring user login, a feature already offered by DuckDuckGo and Brave. Many schools remain deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem despite privacy concerns, making migration to alternative providers difficult. The EFF maintains that decisions about AI use in classrooms should rest with schools, not with a dominant technology provider.

Security.NLTranslated from NL

Read at source

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has condemned Google for attempting to impose its artificial intelligence tools on American schools. Last week Google announced that schools using its educational services would lose access to Google Search unless they agreed to enable AI features.

Following widespread criticism, Google reversed the policy. Schools can now continue using Google Search without being required to activate the Gemini AI tool. At the same time, the company stated that its search engine is effectively an AI chatbot.

According to the EFF, the episode demonstrates how a tech monopolist can pressure schools into accepting generative AI. Even after withdrawing the explicit requirement, Google continues to push AI across its search products, leaving schools with limited practical choices.

The EFF is calling on Google to provide an option to disable AI-generated answers in Search without forcing users to log in, a capability already available from DuckDuckGo and Brave. The group also highlighted the difficulty many schools face when trying to reduce dependence on Google services due to existing privacy concerns and deep integration within the Google ecosystem.

The organization insists that schools, not technology companies, should decide whether and how AI is used in the classroom.

GoogleGeminiBraveDuckDuckGoEFF
ShareXFacebookLinkedInReddit
Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Privacy & Surveillance

Dutch Minister Confirms Amsterdam Police Drones Lack AI Image Recognition for Traffic Enforcement
Privacy & Surveillance

Dutch Minister Confirms Amsterdam Police Drones Lack AI Image Recognition for Traffic Enforcement

Justice and Security Minister Van Weel has clarified that drones deployed by Amsterdam police for monitoring dangerous traffic behavior do not use AI-based image recognition. The technology is neither present on the devices nor applied to footage afterward. All identification of violations relies solely on direct observation by police officers. The drones feature multiple lenses and sensors including thermal imaging and a laser rangefinder, with images captured at 48 megapixel resolution. Recording occurs only when a specific violation is observed, producing a single photograph of the rear of the vehicle. The minister emphasized that operations remain incidental, location-specific, and triggered by public reports rather than systematic surveillance.

Security.NLNov 9, 2026Translated from NL

Dutch Government Expands Data Collection on Demonstrators, Human Rights Body Warns
Privacy & Surveillance

Dutch Government Expands Data Collection on Demonstrators, Human Rights Body Warns

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights has warned that Dutch authorities are collecting increasing amounts of personal information about demonstrations and participants. This practice risks deterring citizens from joining protests or engaging in public debate. The data gathered can include names, addresses, political or religious views, and even social media details requested by municipalities. The institute notes that such monitoring puts human rights under pressure and may create a cycle of distrust between organizers and government agencies. Recommendations include limiting personal data collection, improving transparency of information processing, and avoiding measures that discourage public participation. Most demonstrations proceed without incident, yet overly broad surveillance could still discourage civic engagement.

Security.NLNov 9, 2026Translated from NL

PUODO Fines Poznań Logistics University PLN 64,652 for Inadequate GDPR Risk Analysis
Privacy & Surveillance

PUODO Fines Poznań Logistics University PLN 64,652 for Inadequate GDPR Risk Analysis

The Polish data protection authority PUODO has imposed a fine of 64,652 zł on Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki w Poznaniu for failing to conduct proper risk assessments and implement sufficient technical and organizational measures under GDPR. The violation came to light after a staff member accidentally shared a file containing personal data of 964 students via the university's online deanery platform. The file was accessed by 125 out of 388 authorized users and downloaded 361 times. PUODO found that the university's risk analysis ignored risks such as accidental data disclosure, even after the incident occurred. The authority also referenced a prior high-profile case involving ING Bank Śląski, which received an 18.4 million zł fine later upheld by the courts. The university was ordered to update its processing operations to minimize data protection risks. President Mirosław Wróblewski emphasized the need for accountability and confidentiality in handling student records.

ekurakNov 6, 2026Translated from Polish