Supply Chain & Open Source

compromised packages, npm/PyPI attacks, vendor compromise, dependency risk

Latest

Passwordless Kubernetes Image Pulling with Artifact Keeper via ServiceAccount Tokens
Malicious Code Injected into LiteLLM Open Source AI Package via Supply Chain Attack
GhostAction Campaign Compromises 790 GitHub Repositories via Malicious Workflows
SberTech Launches Platform V Orchestrator for Security Services to Scan Software Before Corporate Deployment
NEC Subcontractor Suffers Cyber Attack Leading to Customer System Disruptions and Personal Data Leak
OVHcloud CLI Compromised: Infostealer Distributed Through Hijacked GitHub Releases for 25 Minutes
Supply Chain Attacks Target Ledger Hardware Wallets with Evolving Backdoors
Audit of 25 Package Managers Shows Only Two Verify Every Package's Integrity Against Compromised Repositories
Compromised ConnectWise Credential Used to Access 173 Microsoft 365 Environments in Supply Chain Attack
OIDC Configured but GitHub Actions Still Vulnerable: Megalodon and actions-cool Attacks Expose Runner Risks
GitHub Repo Trap with 1774 Stars Mimics Microsoft Activation Scripts to Deliver Malware via Telegram Bot
GhostAction Campaign Expands to Inject Malicious GitHub Workflows Stealing AWS Keys and Tokens
Security Researcher Builds SAST Scanner for AI-Generated Code and Audits 3,800 Public Repositories
Vendor Responsibility in Open Source: Licensing Obligations Exposed by Sonatype Nexus Changes
PhantomSub Campaign Deploys 101 Malicious npm Packages to Hijack WhatsApp Accounts for Unauthorized Channel Subscriptions
AI Model Hallucinations Fuel Slopsquatting Attacks on PyPI and npm Registries
Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest
Sapper Revives Minefield to Deliver Accurate SBOM-Based Vulnerability Impact Reports for Cyber Resilience Act Compliance
Fake Terraform Providers on HashiCorp Registry Distribute Go Malware to Developers
Challenges in Building Accurate SBOMs for C and C++ Projects Highlighted by CodeScoring Analysis
CrowdSec Confirms Theft of Source Code from Roughly 300 GitHub Repositories via TanStack Supply Chain Attack
Dependency Confusion Attacks Let Attackers Hijack Internal Library Names in Corporate Builds
NEOMSA ESB Release Strengthens Supply Chain Security Through SBOM and Dependency Hardening
CodeScoring Launches CodeScoring.Save Artifact Repository for Secure Enterprise Development
WordPress to Automatically Block High-Risk Plugin Updates Before Distribution
Twitch Enhanced Viewer Extension Leaks OAuth Tokens From Nearly 31,000 Users
Twitch Enhanced Viewer Extension Leaks OAuth Tokens from Nearly 31,000 Users
Widespread AI Outage Exposes Fragile Cloud Dependencies Behind ChatGPT, Claude and Grok
Protestware: How Ideologically Motivated Attackers Compromise Open Source Code and Supply Chains
Attackers Exploit Critical JFrog Artifactory Flaw CVE-2026-82329 to Forge Admin Tokens and Poison CI/CD Pipelines
Critical JFrog Artifactory Flaw CVE-2026-82329 Actively Exploited to Forge Admin Tokens in Self-Managed Deployments
Supply Chain & Open Source

Critical JFrog Artifactory Flaw CVE-2026-82329 Actively Exploited to Forge Admin Tokens in Self-Managed Deployments

A critical vulnerability identified as CVE-2026-82329 in JFrog Artifactory is being actively exploited in the wild, enabling unauthenticated attackers to generate or forge administrator tokens simply by having network access to affected instances. The flaw impacts self-managed installations that retain default configurations, a common scenario when repositories are deployed quickly and later exposed to the internet. Once administrative access is obtained, attackers can enumerate users and groups, access sensitive configurations, read stored artifacts, and modify security settings. The most severe risk arises when Artifactory automatically feeds CI/CD pipelines, allowing malicious substitution of trusted packages, container images, or dependencies that then propagate downstream into production environments. JFrog Cloud instances were already protected, while self-managed deployments require updates to specific patched versions including 7.111.21, 7.117.28, 7.125.20, 7.133.29, 7.146.38, or 7.161.20. Even after patching, previously issued tokens must be revoked because their validity operates independently of the software update. Organizations are advised to restrict network exposure, rotate credentials, audit token generation logs, and validate artifact integrity for any material published during the vulnerable period.

HispasecSep 3, 2026Translated from Spanish